George Washington Mural in San Francisco Must Not Be Destroyed

Officials in San Francisco have voted to spend close to a million dollars to paint over a Depression-era mural.

The reasoning and faulty logic sounds familiar to most conservatives: The picture includes slaves and Indians laboring for colonists and George Washington, and celebrates colonialism, slavery, and white supremacy and thus should be erased.

But the counter-arguments are particularly persuasive in this case.

This is not Confederate statues that are used as symbols of white supremacy but George Washington, the founder of our country.

Liberals are banning art, books, music, statues. I seem to recall some other folks who did that in the 1930’s. #FoxNation #StarnesCountry

— toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) July 9, 2019

San Francisco will spend up to $600,000 to paint over a New Deal-era mural that depicts George Washington as a soldier, surveyor and statesman and shows white pioneers standing over the body of a Native American and slaves working at Mount Vernon.

— Los Angeles Times (@latimes) July 5, 2019

San Francisco votes to paint over “racist” mural of George Washington, and spend up to $600k to do it!

— Fox & Friends First (@FoxFriendsFirst) July 5, 2019

Nearly 400 writers and academics are protesting the planned destruction of a controversial mural depicting the life of George Washington:

— artnet (@artnet) July 8, 2019

The “Life of Washington” was painted by Victor Arnautoff 83 years ago, so it is from a famous and respected artist.

His work was controversial at the time because his inclusion of slaves and Native-Americans was a subtle critique of American history.

It praised George Washington and America’s founding but reminded anybody who looked at it that it was based in part on conquest and slavery. Much like the streets at West Point that were named after Confederates in the name of reconciliation, the San Francisco officials ignore the intent of this critical piece of art.

They have rather simplistic views of history and feel that anything that disagrees with their current “wokeness” must be purged.

Instead, they have rather simplistic views of history and feel that anything that disagrees with their current “wokeness” must be purged.

But they end up reminding this writer of the Taliban who destroyed Buddhist statues. Some of these statues were the largest in the world, several thousand years old, and priceless cultural artifacts.

But they were un-Islamic and thus destroyed.

So many people in

Source:: LifeZette


(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *